Thursday 2 April 2015

Space Propaganda in Good Bye, Lenin !





Censorship in Good Bye Lenin !
The German tragicomedy Good Bye Lenin, released in 2003, is a movie about censorship. The storyline is based around a family in the GDR part of Berlin around the fall of the Soviet Union and the destruction of the Berlin Wall. Censorship can be defined as the suppression of speech, public communication or other information which may be considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, politically inconvenient as determined by governments, media outlets, authorities or other groups or institutions.

Not only is censorship restrictive but Butler argues that censorship is a productive form of power: it is not merely privative, but formative as well. I want to distinguish this position from the one that would claim that speech is incidental to the aims of censorship. Censorship seeks to produce subjects according explicit and implicit norms, and this production of the subject had everything to do with the regulation of speech. By the latter, I do not mean to imply that the subject is narrowly liked to the regulation of that subject's speech, but rather to the regulation of the social domain of speakable discourse.

The first notion of censorship in the movie starts with the prologue, where the oldest son Alex follows how the first German, Sigmund Jähn enters into space. Especially in the context of Cold War and competition between the West and the East, or the USA and the USSR, technology to enter space was an important aspect of censorship by both parties. More than the weapon or economic race, both powers used space missions and the race to be the first on the moon as an important part of their propaganda of who was best. The race to be the first on the moon and the adjusted discourse and information towards the people produced a feeling of unity and superiority. At the beginning and the end of the movie, this identification with Socialism and therefore USSR for the main character, Alex, was mainly based on the discourse around entering space.



But after the prologue a different side of the Communist regime is showed in a scene where the father of Max has fled to the West, leaving the mother depressed. When she recovers and comes home she devote herself to the ideology of Socialism. Here comes another notion of censorship as a productive form of power, as the mother called Christiane becomes part of the formative form of censorship in her role as teacher and member of the Socialist club, therefore becoming an intermediary between the Censors (socialist regime) and the Censored (children).

In the scene where the actual story starts, groups of people protesting people walk among the streets for free press, which is an repressive and direct form of censorship. Alex is among them and meets his future girlfriend Lara. This call to stop the direct censorship is violently stopped by the police, the political instrument to enforce law and order by the institution in power. While Alex is being arrested, his mother sees this and gets a heart attack. When Alex is released she is in coma and the doctor doesn’t know if she will come back.

While the mother is in coma the USSR implodes, the wall falls and Germany is reunited. The main discourse is that the free liberal west now comes into the conservative and suppressed east to modernize Berlin. After all these event, around eight months, the mother wake up from her coma. After initial happiness, the doctors tells Alex and his sister Ariane that the mother is still very weak and the situation dangerous. She could suffer another fatal heart attack after another shock. Alex realized that the discovery of current events of unification of Germany would lead to her death, and therefore comes up with a plan to censor his mother to protect her.

He creates a scene where all the flows of information misled the mother that she still live in the GDR, the conservative socialist regime without capitalist take over from the West. While successful for a long time through various scenes, the deception is becoming more difficult after the mother recovers and slowly starts to explore more than her room. The interesting part of the main part of the movie is the inception of Max his ideas and connection with Socialism, resulting into the censoring of the GDR as Max would see it. In this case Max self-censored his information about the GDR towards his mother. The initial notion of censorship used by the Socialist regime, that off space flights and the race about the moon is reflected through the censored GDR of Max. He meets Sigmund Jähn who is now a taxi driver and in his last reflection of the GDR before his mother dies is how Sigmund Jähn becomes the new leader of the USSR, based on his perspective of somebody who went to space. In the last scene, where the mother had died happy and deceived, they send her ashes into space with a self-made rocket.  

In the movie Good Bye Lenin, several forms of censorship were used. The most common use of censorship, restrictive censorship was seen at the police arrests and the restricted flow of information Max allowed his mother to be seen. The productive form of censorship was seen in how the USSR used space technology as a discourse as a regulation of speakable discourse, and how this influenced the perspective of the main character Max. The film starts with how Max is inspired by this entering of space, and it also ends with the ashes of the mother being send to space. Throughout the movie an evolution of this self-censoring around space missions and Sigmund Jähn as the new supreme leader of Socialism.

Müller, Beate. „Censorship and Cultural Regulation: Mapping the Territory.“  Critical Studies. Censorship and Cultural Regulation in the Modern Age. Ed. By Beate Müller. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi, 2004, 1-31.

Bernays, Edward. Propaganda ig publishing Brooklyn New York 1928 p.159

Eisman, Gene. and Hardesty, Von Epic Rivalry The Inside Story of the Soviet and American Space Race National Geographic Washington DC 2007 p.xxv

Image : http://cdn.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/space_prop016.jpg

Wednesday 1 April 2015

Goodbye Lenin, Hello new horizons

Goodbye Lenin is a German movie who was recommended to me by several of my friends. All were unanimous: it is a chef d'oeuvre, grandiose movie I should be ashamed of not having seen yet. Therefore I watched it. And if I personally did not find it as mind blowing as it was depicted to me, I do agree it is a classic, an indispensable landmark in the cinematographic and social studies' history.
In Goodbye Lenin (2003), director Wolfgang Becker follow Alex Kerner (Daniel Brühl) in his attempts to recreate Soviet German Democratic Republic. Alex young idealist adult from Eastern Berlin assists to the transformation of Eastern Germany and the transition from his childhood communist Berlin to a modern, consumerist and capitalist Berlin. Originally pro-transition, Alex does not accept this new Berlin, far different from his illusions. The awakening from a coma of his socialist party-partisan mother who missed the fall of the Berlin Wall gives him the perfect prefect to return time. For his mother, Alex will censor his family, neighbors, and even himself; Thus bringing down the silent censorship on the reunification of the two Germany. Thanks to Alex, Wolfgang Becker addresses here two aspects often ignored of censorship : socio-cultural censorship and media's censorship.

Often ignored, socio-cultural censorship is just as, if not more, powerful than the State's. Often passed under silence, it is more and more studied as the public sphere “open up”. Paradoxically, as more and more discussions arise on women rights, racism and other post-modern subjects, the social pressure against anyone who's opinion differs from the “politically correct” increases (Mueller 3). As capitalism became the main socio-politico-economical system around the world, its competitors are academically and politically criticized. However for a certain regime to resist for years, its citizens must be able to survive and thrive to a certain point. In this sense, the reunification of Germany is often depicted as the end of a “dark” period. Yet, only qualifying it as so is denying the memories and childhoods of thousands of East Germans. Through Alex's resistance, the movie reminds its spectators that humans lived and loved during 50 years under socialism.
Confirming that this refreshing approach was a valuable addition to the study of the end of the Cold War, Becker's movie was overwhelmingly acclaimed world wide. Subtle critic of both communism and capitalism, Goodbye Lenin is the voice of the citizens who have to live through any specific regime. It opens a new dimension of discussions in the German public sphere, openly criticizing the end of socialism. Moreover, by opening such a discussion, this movie also questions how the transition is nowadays presented and thus the limits of reality.

As the idealist image Alex had of capitalism only leaves him frustrated, confronted to the reality; Alex develops nostalgia towards the old regime, symbol of his past and happy childhood.
Helped by his sister, girlfriend and neighbors, Alex thus recreate this nostalgic past. To do so, he goes as far as filming fake news to convince his mother, taking over the role of the media. Which brings us to another dilemma Becker touches upon : media are the support and defenders of the “Truth”. Yet, as they present facts a certain way, they create a discourse and distort the truth they are delivering to their trusting watchers. To support his claims, Alex uses images from the real situation, such as Eastern Berliners escaping to West-Berlin but present them as depicting the exact contrary. Yet, as time goes on, Alex himself admits that it becomes increasingly difficult to return to reality. His fiction takes a life of his own, where the discourse Alex created becomes the norm, even for himself. And despite the unbelievability news reports Alex's mother watches, she can do nothing but passively accepts this “truth”. Such scenes brings us back to the actual world. Goodbye Lenin reminds us that media, on whom we count to gather the informations necessary to our existence, are not innocent nor a symbol of objectivity. Depending which facts are presented to us, by whom but also how and through which support, only a certain side of our fluid reality comes to light. Of course, it is impossible to depict all aspects and points of view on a situation. However, the danger is when a media's representation of reality becomes the only truth, as Alex's representation of East-Berlin becomes his mother's truth. Media then become censors, silencing others' opinions:
Despite being the representation of the liberty of speech against any type of censorships, media are both subjects of socio-cultural censorship and censors of informations and reality.

To summarize, Wolfgang Becker shows us that just as Capitalism is no heaven, Socialism is no hell. It was a human system. It was indeed strict and full of hardships but nonetheless, as human lives went on, people adapted to it and integrated the system into their culture and their roots. Forgetting about this fact and thinking of Socialist Germany only from a political perspective is to deny the past of all its inhabitants. Becker also teaches us we ought not to forget that the reality we perceive is based on words and discourses. And many if not most of these discourses are carried and reproduced through media's proactive choices.
To conclude, Goodbye Lenin is a story. A story of frustration, of growing up. A story where reality and fiction get mix to the point where the hero is not sure which is which. And where we starts questioning as well, if the reality we are taught is the one we want to follow. A story worth watching.


Works referenced :
Müller, Beate. “Censorship and Cultural Regulation: Mapping the Territory”.
Good Bye Lenin! Dir. Wolfgang Becker. Perf. Daniel Brühl, Katrin Saß, Maria Simon, and Chulpan Khamatova. X Verleih AG, 2003.