Sunday 22 February 2015

Gordimer, on the necessity of silent dissidents to join the vital protest.

Nadine Gordimer refers to the last years of the apartheid as an interregnum where political subtleties were often shut as to not undermine the understood general goal (280). In her essay Living in the Interregnum (1982) she addresses the need for the several voices to not silence their different nuances. As, rather than to weaken the cause, to deepen the debate for a new system.

Gordimer cites in her essay a young black South-African woman : “I break the law because I am alive” (271). Such a strong statement is based on the casual daily racism of the Apartheid regime. Under this regime, black people were, from birth, designated to an inferior standing. If they wanted their human rights back they thus had to daily declaim this situation and claim that their life was worth as much as any other. On the other side, white people did not have to justify their existence on a daily basis, as the system was made to justify their position and rights. As such they had no incentives to raise their voice and shout against the injustice.
Do not take me wrong, part of the South-African white population was already decrying the inherent racism of the regime. However, as Gordimer critics it, most stayed silent dissidents; refusing to put themselves in danger and unaware what the word struggle truthfully meant (270).
Nevertheless, it is necessary for this silent segment of the population to join the scream of the black population for justice. It is needed to answer one of the white population fear of a reversed regime. And thus transit from a discriminatory capitalist regime to a social nondiscriminatory system (265).

However, if she longly address the evolution of the black demands, the necessity of a joined struggle and the issue of the conflicted and contradictory interregnum, Gordimer solely does so. She does not on the contrary propose any solution to create the wanted reaction in the passive dissidents. As a writer, her role may be to exclusively expose the facts and leave to politicians and leaders this reflexion. Yet, as an influential white South-African champion in the fight against the apartheid, to learn from her experience would have been a valuable addition. To listen to how she passed from spectator of this interregnum to participant and major voice.


Gordimer, Nadine. “Living in the Interregnum.” The Essential Gesture: Writing, Politics, and Places. 272-284. 1988. London: Jonathan Cape. PDF

1 comment:

  1. When I read Gordimer’s essay, I found it indeed very interesting to see how she did not propose any solution to create the wanted reaction in the passive dissidents. I think it tells us a lot about the particular time period in which this essay was written, 8 years before the end of apartheid.
    These silent dissidents would put themselves in danger if they were to speak up about the racism of the regime. In some way, Gordimer is not that different from them. Of course her works have been very valuable, but her role has been exclusively to expose facts and thus influence politicians as you pointed out. Would you rather have seen that she did come with solutions? Would you rather have her evoking a reaction from these passive dissidents? Because to some extent, I felt like she stayed between the lines with this essay. Instead of evoking a reaction from those who silently oppose apartheid, she often tried to speak for the black community, pretending to have a ‘black voice’.

    ReplyDelete